As you know from prior posts, if I do anything well, then it’s public self-deprecation. And, thus, I’m embarrassed to admit that I wrongly attributed the In re Carter (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Dec. 13, 2023) Sub V opinion to Judge Sage Sigler (Bankr. N.D. Ga.) instead of Judge Jeffery Cavender (Bankr. N.D. Ga.). How did
Notable Subchapter V Bankruptcy Opinions: December 2023 (AI Edition)
Continuing with the monthly series, here are short summaries of December 2023’s Subchapter V bankruptcy opinions from across the country. As in the prior Sub V case posts, I’ll provide a roadmap of the issues and then you can click the opinions if you want to dig deeper.
However, there’s a “fun” catch this month. Recently, Stone & Baxter upgraded from Lexis+ to Lexis+ AI. Given that I’m inundated almost daily with emails about artificial intelligence and law practice, I couldn’t help but feel behind the times. Thus, I’m excited to have something to experiment with. And that’s exactly what I’m going to do with this post. Continue Reading Notable Subchapter V Bankruptcy Opinions: December 2023 (AI Edition)
Notable Subchapter V Bankruptcy Opinions: October and November 2023 Edition
With no introduction or fanfare, here, in a single post, are short summaries of October 2023’s and November 2023’s notable Subchapter V opinions from across the country.
As in the prior Sub V case posts, I’ll provide a roadmap of the issues and then you can click the opinions if you want to dig deeper.
Happy New Year!Continue Reading Notable Subchapter V Bankruptcy Opinions: October and November 2023 Edition
Notable Subchapter V Bankruptcy Opinions: August and September Edition
There were no Sub V opinions in August that I could find, so I’ll pick-up with the September opinions. And by now, you know the drill: I’ll provide, in a single post, short summaries of each month’s notable Subchapter V opinions from across the country (which basically means all Sub V opinions from that month). Rather than providing all-encompassing summaries, I’ll provide a roadmap of the issues and then you can click the opinions if you want to dig deeper.
Sorry that I got behind, but here are the September Subchapter V opinions:Continue Reading Notable Subchapter V Bankruptcy Opinions: August and September Edition
Notable Subchapter V Bankruptcy Opinions: July 2023 Edition
In this post, I’ll continue in my effort to provide, in a single post, short summaries of each month’s notable Subchapter V opinions from across the country. Rather than all-encompassing summaries, I’ll provide a roadmap of the issues and then you can click the opinions if you want to dig deeper. Here are the July 2023 Subchapter V opinions. Assuming my search was thorough enough, there were only two opinions in July:Continue Reading Notable Subchapter V Bankruptcy Opinions: July 2023 Edition
Notable Subchapter V Bankruptcy Opinions: June 2023 Edition
Picking up where I left off last month, I’ll continue my experiment of providing short summaries of each month’s notable Subchapter V opinions. Again, these are not going to be all-encompassing summaries. Rather, we’ll provide a roadmap of the issues and then you can click the cases if you want to dig deeper. Here are
Notable Subchapter V Bankruptcy Opinions: May 2023 Edition
While Plan Proponent is primarily about Chapter 11 confirmation issues, Subchapter V is becoming a bigger part of Stone & Baxter’s debtor practice, especially with the temporary $7.5 million debt limit. Thus, I’m going to experiment with providing short summaries of each month’s notable Subchapter V opinions. These are not going to be all-encompassing summaries. Rather, we’ll provide a roadmap of the issues and then you can click the cases if you want to dig deeper. We’ll start with May 2023.
Continue Reading Notable Subchapter V Bankruptcy Opinions: May 2023 Edition